1:32 CH01-23 first tests
Posted: Tue 24. Jan 2023 15:18
Just to brake it. They are the fastest so far.
I did a few laps without much tuning, just as the came out of the print. No body yet.
I tested both versions with same motor and ESC. I did not have more available ESC's.
These are both RE ( rear engine ) versions at 75 mm WB. Going to make a few Peugeot 206/ Toyota. Starlet out of them.
No doubt 32 size feels quicker on the track. And they are. Down from 10.5 as the fastes so fare for the 1:24 scale.
I did a few 10.1xx on bothe these 1:32 cars.
BUT the first one with battery in normal position sits looser on the track and is less willing to turn when not connected to the magline - slightly too light front end.
That's why I teste with a 'front' battery as well. I feels easier to drive and I shave another 0.02 sec of the laptime, just after a few laps.
I'm going to put up some videos in a few days - even witout bodies.
I did a few laps without much tuning, just as the came out of the print. No body yet.
I tested both versions with same motor and ESC. I did not have more available ESC's.
These are both RE ( rear engine ) versions at 75 mm WB. Going to make a few Peugeot 206/ Toyota. Starlet out of them.
No doubt 32 size feels quicker on the track. And they are. Down from 10.5 as the fastes so fare for the 1:24 scale.
I did a few 10.1xx on bothe these 1:32 cars.
BUT the first one with battery in normal position sits looser on the track and is less willing to turn when not connected to the magline - slightly too light front end.
That's why I teste with a 'front' battery as well. I feels easier to drive and I shave another 0.02 sec of the laptime, just after a few laps.
I'm going to put up some videos in a few days - even witout bodies.